Share:

I-240 NB over I240 WB / AGNES PL & RR

Map 

Coordinates:
+35.12500, -90.02444
35°07'30" N, 90°01'28" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:I-240 NB over I240 WB / AGNES PL & RR
Structure number:79I02400036
Location:0.38 MI. S OF SR-4 JCT.
Purpose:Carries highway over highway and railroad
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:113.9 ft. [34.7 m]
Total length:586.0 ft. [178.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:47.6 ft. [14.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:24.9 ft. [7.6 m]
Skew angle:25°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1966
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:7
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:100,050 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:59.4 tons [54.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:68.8
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$2,756,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201568.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory100050
February 201369.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory96710
March 201168.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory98900
April 200968.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory99840
June 200768.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory100890
August 200569.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory94810
August 200373.2Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory99840
September 200173.0Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory101870
February 200073.0Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood84560
February 199863.9Structurally deficientSeriousGoodGood92240
September 199564.4Structurally deficientSeriousGoodGood89230
August 199365.4Structurally deficientSeriousGoodGood79220
November 199163.2Structurally deficientSeriousGoodGood99770