Share:

I-240 EB over I-240 EB. / WALKER AVE

Map 

Coordinates:
+35.11917, -90.02611
35°07'09" N, 90°01'34" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:I-240 EB over I-240 EB. / WALKER AVE
Structure number:79I02400037
Location:0.8 MI. S OF SR-4 JCT.
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Total length:143.1 ft. [43.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:47.9 ft. [14.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:55.8 ft. [17.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:11°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1966
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:100,050 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:57.4 tons [52.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:33.7 tons [30.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:66.7
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$1,861,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201566.7Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory100050
February 201378.9Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory96710
March 201179.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory98900
April 200978.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory99840
June 200778.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory100890
August 200579.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory94810
August 200380.9Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory99840
September 200180.8Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory101870
February 200081.7Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory84560
February 199880.4Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory92240
September 199583.5Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory89230
August 199384.4Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory79220
November 199182.6Not deficientGoodGoodSatisfactory99770