FAU 176 over I-240 & RAMPS


+35.07944, -89.93111
35°04'46" N, 89°55'52" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:FAU 176 over I-240 & RAMPS
Structure number:79I02400099
Location:SR-176 OVER I-240 & RAMPS
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:74.8 ft. [22.8 m]
Total length:227.0 ft. [69.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:100.1 ft. [30.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:115.2 ft. [35.1 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:17.1 ft. [5.2 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1958
Year reconstructed:2003
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete continuous [6]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Precast Panels [2]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2017 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:35,870 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:59.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$1,541,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201759.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory35870
March 201559.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory32180
March 201359.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory33540
April 201159.0Not deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory34120
May 200958.0Not deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory35230
September 200759.0Not deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory37520
September 200560.0Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory38270
October 200381.0Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory39770
October 200178.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory42480
March 200078.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory45780
January 199881.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory43750
October 199581.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory42260
September 199354.0Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor38620
December 199181.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood43560