+35.06056, -89.93083
35°03'38" N, 89°55'51" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:FAS 176 over TEN MILE CREEK
Structure number:79S81110008
Location:0.3 MI N OF SR-4 JCT.
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Total length:102.0 ft. [31.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:38.1 ft. [11.6 m]
Skew angle:42°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1961
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:32,180 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:76.1
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$260,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201576.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory32180
March 201376.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory33540
April 201175.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory34120
May 200975.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory35230
September 200764.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair37520
September 200564.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair38270
October 200364.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair39770
October 200163.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair42480
March 200055.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair45780
March 199852.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair43750
October 199553.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair42260
September 199354.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair38620
December 199153.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair43560