Share:

FAP 3 over SR-3 / SR-1

Map 

Coordinates:
+35.14111, -90.04500
35°08'28" N, 90°02'42" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:FAP 3 over SR-3 / SR-1
Structure number:79SR0010005
Location:UNION OVER D. THOMAS BLVD
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:41.3 ft. [12.6 m]
Total length:82.7 ft. [25.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:65.9 ft. [20.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:80.1 ft. [24.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1965
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete continuous [6]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:16,420 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:58.4 tons [53.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:34.7 tons [31.5 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:68.3
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$1,471,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201568.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair16420
February 201369.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair14490
April 201168.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair15780
May 200968.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair15850
August 200780.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory17790
September 200580.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory18110
September 200381.1Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory19970
October 200183.8Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory17290
February 200084.3Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory16500
February 199849.7Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory17400
September 199547.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory17310
August 199347.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory18620
December 199147.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory18160