Share:

FAU 57 EBL over SR57 EB / SR57 WB RAMP

Map 

Coordinates:
+35.10278, -89.87167
35°06'10" N, 89°52'18" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:FAU 57 EBL over SR57 EB / SR57 WB RAMP
Structure number:79SR0570003
Location:I-240 JUNCTION
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:65.3 ft. [19.9 m]
Total length:233.6 ft. [71.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:33.8 ft. [10.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.8 ft. [4.2 m]
Skew angle:45°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1959
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:43,650 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:47.5 tons [43.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:28.7 tons [26.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:68.9
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$130,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201568.9Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory43650
March 201366.9Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory41590
April 201166.9Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory43890
May 200966.9Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory40060
August 200768.9Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory40760
September 200571.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory42710
September 200371.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory41030
October 200171.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory44950
February 200073.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory47120
February 199873.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory44190
October 199573.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory44490
September 199364.0Structurally deficientSeriousSatisfactoryFair38830
December 199164.0Structurally deficientSeriousSatisfactoryFair38550