Share:

CR 14650 over Hickory Creek

Map 

Coordinates:
+33.52398, -95.51060
33°31'26" N, 95°30'38" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CR 14650 over Hickory Creek
Structure number:011390AA0434001
Location:1.6 Mi E of FM 1498
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:28.9 ft. [8.8 m]
Total length:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1997
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2015 

Status:Open, posting recommended but not legally implemented [B]
Average daily traffic:40 [as of 2010]
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:49.2
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$1,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
December 201549.2Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactoryPoor40
January 201449.2Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactoryPoor40
February 201249.2Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactoryPoor40
February 201056.7Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactoryPoor40
February 200858.0Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactoryPoor40
March 200658.0Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactoryPoor40
February 200484.7Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood40
January 200282.7Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood40
February 200077.5Not deficientVery GoodSatisfactoryVery Good10
January 199872.5Not deficientVery GoodGoodVery Good10
May 199616.8Structurally deficientCriticalCriticalCritical10
July 199516.8Structurally deficientCriticalCriticalCritical10
February 199416.2Structurally deficientCriticalCriticalCritical50
December 199116.2Structurally deficientSeriousPoorSerious50