CR 510 (24800) over Cane Creek


+33.57213, -95.72201
33°34'20" N, 95°43'19" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:CR 510 (24800) over Cane Creek
Structure number:011390AA0510001
Location:0.3 Mi W of FM 38
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:47.9 ft. [14.6 m]
Total length:66.9 ft. [20.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:23.0 ft. [7.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:23.6 ft. [7.2 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1990
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Other [00]
Deck type:Steel plate (includes orthotropic) [5]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2014 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:50 [as of 2010]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:9.9 tons [9.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:6.9 tons [6.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:39.6
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$9,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201439.6Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory50
February 201249.6Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory50
January 201049.6Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory50
February 200849.6Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory50
March 200648.6Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory50
February 200449.6Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory50
February 200249.6Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory50
April 200147.0Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory50
April 200047.0Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory50
March 199842.3Not deficientVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory50
March 199640.3Not deficientGoodGoodSatisfactory50
March 199439.3Not deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory50
February 199236.2Not deficientGoodGoodGood50