CR 25630 over Tributary of Rowdy Creek


+33.56638, -95.78513
33°33'59" N, 95°47'06" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:CR 25630 over Tributary of Rowdy Creek
Structure number:011390AA0541002
Location:3.1 Mi S of FM 1509
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:37.1 ft. [11.3 m]
Total length:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1999
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Open Grating [3]
Wearing surface:Other [9]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2014 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:30 [as of 2010]
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:9.9 tons [9.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:6.9 tons [6.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:38.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$5,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201438.0Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory30
February 201238.0Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory30
January 201039.1Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory30
February 200839.1Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory30
March 200639.1Not deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory30
February 200439.1Not deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory30
March 200239.1Not deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory30
June 200063.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory10
March 199827.5Structurally deficientGoodFairPoor10
March 199629.0Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactorySerious10
March 199425.6Structurally deficientVery GoodSatisfactorySerious50
June 199327.8Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySerious50
December 199127.8Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySerious50