CR 149, PCT 3 over PULUXY RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+32.35389, -98.0259032°21'14" N, 98°01'33" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | CR 149, PCT 3 over PULUXY RIVER |
| Structure number: | 020730AA0149002 |
| Location: | .15 MI N OF US 377 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 201.1 ft. [61.3 m] |
| Total length: | 268.1 ft. [81.7 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 9.8 ft. [3.0 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 9.8 ft. [3.0 m] |
| Vertical clearance above deck: | 6.9 ft. [2.1 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1934 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Suspension [13] |
| Deck type: | Steel plate (includes orthotropic) [5] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Bridge closed to all traffic [K] |
| Average daily traffic: | 50 [as of 2004] |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Imminent Failure [1 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 15.6 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $14,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Bridge closed to all traffic [K] |
| Average daily traffic: | 10 [as of 2000] |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Imminent Failure [1 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 15.9 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $134,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Bridge closed to all traffic [K] |
| Average daily traffic: | 50 [as of 1991] |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Imminent Failure [1 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 17.9 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $134,000 |