COCA COLA RNCH P-1 over West Fork Trinity River


+33.26797, -98.03052
33°16'05" N, 98°01'50" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:COCA COLA RNCH P-1 over West Fork Trinity River
Structure number:021200AA0130001
Location:4.6 MI S OF FM 1810
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Total length:220.2 ft. [67.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:2002
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:160 [as of 2009]
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:92.1

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201592.1Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood160
January 201392.1Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood160
January 201194.1Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood160
January 200994.1Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood160
January 200794.1Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood160
January 200599.8Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood70
January 200399.8Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good70
January 200299.8Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent70
January 200113.8Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorPoor70
January 199914.4Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorPoor60
March 199714.4Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorPoor60
January 199520.5Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairFair50
March 199327.4Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairFair50
February 199130.6Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairFair50