CR 3034 over BRADY CREEK


+31.21969, -99.66380
31°13'11" N, 99°39'50" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:CR 3034 over BRADY CREEK
Structure number:070480AA0139002
Location:0.30 MI E OF CR 3077
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:13.1 ft. [4.0 m]
Total length:97.1 ft. [29.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1930
Historic significance:Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3]
Number of main spans:8
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2015 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:30 [as of 2013]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:17.8 tons [16.2 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:49.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$9,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201549.0Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair30
June 201349.0Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair30
June 201149.0Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair30
June 200949.2Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair30
June 200749.2Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair30
August 200549.2Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair50
July 200350.3Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair50
September 200126.4Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor50
July 199926.4Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryCritical50
October 199725.4Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySerious50
September 199525.6Structurally deficientGoodGoodSerious50
July 199366.7Not deficientGoodGoodGood50
June 199163.7Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood50