+30.73703, -94.81440
30°44'13" N, 94°48'52" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:111870AA0329003
Location:4.2 MI NE OF US 190
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Total length:28.9 ft. [8.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1984
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Other [00]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Wood or Timber [7]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:62 [as of 2015]
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:20.8 tons [18.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:14.9 tons [13.5 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:30.9
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$4,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201530.9Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactoryPoor62
July 201330.9Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactoryPoor62
July 201128.8Structurally deficientGoodFairPoor62
June 200931.1Structurally deficientGoodFairPoor62
June 200731.1Structurally deficientGoodFairPoor62
June 200547.9Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryFair62
June 200357.5Not deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory62
June 200152.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory62
April 199951.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory62
April 199753.7Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood62
April 199553.7Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood60
May 199334.8Structurally deficientFairGoodGood60
June 199134.8Structurally deficientFairGoodGood60
May 199035.8Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood60