Share:

ANDREW JACKSON DR over MENARD CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+30.67262, -94.83843
30°40'21" N, 94°50'18" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:ANDREW JACKSON DR over MENARD CREEK
Structure number:111870AA1227001
Location:4.3 MI E OF SH 146
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:17.1 ft. [5.2 m]
Total length:37.1 ft. [11.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1990
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Other [00]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:50 [as of 2009]
Truck traffic:19% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:65.3

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201565.3Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryFair50
August 201365.3Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryFair50
August 201165.3Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryFair50
June 200965.3Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryFair50
June 200765.3Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryFair50
June 200565.3Not deficientGoodGoodFair50
September 200476.4Not deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory50