Share:

CR 224 (HOLZ RD) over ELM CREEK BRANCH

Map 

Coordinates:
+29.96996, -97.72747
29°58'12" N, 97°43'39" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CR 224 (HOLZ RD) over ELM CREEK BRANCH
Structure number:140280AA0112001
Location:0.25 MI S OF SH 21
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:73.2 ft. [22.3 m]
Total length:74.2 ft. [22.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:17.1 ft. [5.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:18.0 ft. [5.5 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1989
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Steel plate (includes orthotropic) [5]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2016 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:80 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:39.6 tons [36.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:54.7

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201654.7Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory80
January 201454.7Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory80
February 201281.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory80
February 201082.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory80
January 200882.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood80
March 200682.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood80
May 200481.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood80
April 200281.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood73
April 200081.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood73
February 199879.1Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery Good60
December 199579.1Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery Good60
December 199379.1Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryVery Good60
February 199277.6Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryVery Good210