Share:

OLD LYTTON SPRINGS over DRY CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+29.94889, -97.65870
29°56'56" N, 97°39'31" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:OLD LYTTON SPRINGS over DRY CREEK
Structure number:140280AA0154001
Location:1.00 MI SW OF FM 1185
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:19.0 ft. [5.8 m]
Total length:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:18.0 ft. [5.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:19.4 ft. [5.9 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1934
Historic significance:Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2016 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:120 [as of 2010]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:39.6 tons [36.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:23.8 tons [21.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:74.4
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$1,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201674.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory120
January 201474.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory120
February 201274.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory120
February 201074.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory270
January 200874.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory270
March 200674.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory270
March 200479.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory270
April 200279.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory254
April 200079.4Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory254
February 199879.4Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory210
December 199579.4Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory210
January 199479.4Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory210
January 199289.8Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood45