CR 5 over DRAW


+34.36156, -100.35178
34°21'42" N, 100°21'06" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:CR 5 over DRAW
Structure number:250380AA0272001
Location:1.9 MI S OF FM 94
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:12.1 ft. [3.7 m]
Total length:24.9 ft. [7.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:23.3 ft. [7.1 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1939
Historic significance:Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Gravel [8]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2016 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:20 [as of 2010]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:86.5
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$14,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201686.5Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory20
August 201486.5Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory20
August 201286.5Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory20
August 201086.8Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory20
September 200886.8Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory20
October 200675.8Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair20
November 200486.5Not deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory20
December 200286.5Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good20
December 200086.5Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good20
December 199886.5Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good20
March 199771.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good20
February 199576.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good20
March 199376.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good20
March 199176.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good20