Share:

CR 408 over TONGUE OR S. PEASE RIVER

Map 

Coordinates:
+33.88189, -100.58727
33°52'55" N, 100°35'14" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CR 408 over TONGUE OR S. PEASE RIVER
Structure number:251730AA0105001
Location:7.75 MI E OF CR 441
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Total length:279.9 ft. [85.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:23.3 ft. [7.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1999
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:7
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:10 [as of 2010]
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:97.8

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201497.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood10
September 201297.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood10
August 201097.8Not deficientGoodGoodSatisfactory10
October 200897.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood10
November 200697.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood10
December 200498.8Not deficientVery GoodGoodGood10
January 200399.8Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good10
December 200099.8Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good10
May 199999.8Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent10
September 199724.2Structurally deficient---10
January 199724.2Structurally deficientSeriousCriticalSerious10
January 199526.3Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySerious10
March 199328.3Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySerious10
April 199128.3Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySerious10