TR 03 FAS 177 over WHITE RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+43.78242, -72.4598643°46'57" N, 72°27'35" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | TR 03 FAS 177 over WHITE RIVER |
| Structure number: | 200177001514172 |
| Location: | 0.1 MI S JCT. VT.14 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
| Length of largest span: | 220.2 ft. [67.1 m] |
| Total length: | 324.2 ft. [98.8 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 19.4 ft. [5.9 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 21.3 ft. [6.5 m] |
| Vertical clearance above deck: | 14.4 ft. [4.4 m] |
| Owner: | Town or Township Highway Agency [03] |
| Year built: | 1928 |
| Year reconstructed: | 1994 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
| Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 1,220 [as of 1995] |
| Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 25.7 tons [23.4 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 7.9 tons [7.2 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 10.5 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,752,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 1,220 [as of 1995] |
| Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 46.5 tons [42.3 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 20.8 tons [18.9 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 56.3 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $363,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 630 [as of 1991] |
| Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 43.6 tons [39.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 31.7 tons [28.8 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 67.1 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $2,579,000 |