SR 162 over PUYALLUP R
Map
Coordinates:
+47.12971, -122.2358347°07'47" N, 122°14'09" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | SR 162 over PUYALLUP R |
| Structure number: | 000000JD0000000 |
| Location: | 4.4 E JCT SR 410 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
| Length of largest span: | 170.0 ft. [51.8 m] |
| Total length: | 210.0 ft. [64.0 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 37.4 ft. [11.4 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1934 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1] |
| Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
| Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 18,425 [as of 2007] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Operating rating: | 42.6 tons [38.7 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 25.7 tons [23.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 46.2 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $132,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 10,525 [as of 1994] |
| Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Operating rating: | 42.6 tons [38.7 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 25.7 tons [23.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 46.2 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of relocation of road. [32] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $126,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 5,450 [as of 1984] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 18.8 tons [17.1 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 45.5 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of relocation of road. [32] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,000,000 |