+46.85660, -123.03695
46°51'24" N, 123°02'13" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:0004057A0000000
Location:3.9 N SR 12
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Total length:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:30.8 ft. [9.4 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1951
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2016 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,164 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:15% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:81.2 tons [73.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:72.5
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$23,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201672.5Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory3164
August 201463.3Functionally obsoleteGoodFairFair3164
August 201263.7Functionally obsoleteGoodFairFair2986
September 201055.2Functionally obsoleteGoodFairFair2986
September 200855.2Functionally obsoleteGoodFairFair2986
October 200655.8Functionally obsoleteGoodFairFair2748
October 200468.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood2748
December 200268.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood2748
November 200068.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2748
September 199867.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2945
September 199667.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood2945
October 199468.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood2515
February 199368.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood2602
June 199072.9Not deficientGoodGoodGood1350