SR 203 over SLOUGH
Map
Coordinates:
+47.59125, -121.9063347°35'29" N, 121°54'23" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | SR 203 over SLOUGH |
| Structure number: | 0012947A0000000 |
| Location: | 1.8 N JCT SR 202 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Rural) [06] |
| Length of largest span: | 42.0 ft. [12.8 m] |
| Total length: | 210.0 ft. [64.0 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 33.1 ft. [10.1 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 36.1 ft. [11.0 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1986 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
| Number of main spans: | 5 |
| Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
| Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 7,993 [as of 2007] |
| Truck traffic: | 18% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 90.1 tons [81.9 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 54.5 tons [49.5 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 89.8 |
| Estimated cost of work: | $125,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 4,706 [as of 1994] |
| Truck traffic: | 12% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 90.1 tons [81.9 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 54.5 tons [49.5 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 92.1 |
| Estimated cost of work: | $125,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 2,950 [as of 1984] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 54.5 tons [49.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 92.8 |
| Estimated cost of work: | $660,000 |