Share:

PAXTON TRAIL over ROCK CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+47.05924, -117.96751
47°03'33" N, 117°58'03" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:PAXTON TRAIL over ROCK CREEK
Structure number:081660000000000
Location:~2.50 MI E MCCALL
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:65.9 ft. [20.1 m]
Total length:65.9 ft. [20.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:21.0 ft. [6.4 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1914
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Culvert condition:Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations (including piles) on dry land well above flood water elevations. [9]
Operating rating:72.3 tons [65.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:43.6 tons [39.6 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:96.0
Estimated cost of work:$784,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
December 201496.0Not deficient----
December 201296.0Not deficient----
December 201096.0Not deficient----
December 200897.0Not deficient----
November 200645.7Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryGood-
November 200445.7Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryGood-
March 200345.7Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryGood-
April 200145.7Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryGood-
November 199945.7Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryGood-
October 199775.1Not deficient-SatisfactoryGood-
March 199575.5Not deficient-SatisfactoryGood-
May 199375.5Not deficient-SatisfactoryGood-
October 199175.5Not deficientVery GoodSatisfactoryGood10