Share:

GRAY RD over UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD

Map 

Coordinates:
+46.76646, -118.14971
46°45'59" N, 118°08'59" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:GRAY RD over UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
Structure number:083700000000000
Location:00.27 MI S SR26
Purpose:Carries highway over railroad
Route classification:Minor Collector (Rural) [08]
Length of largest span:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Total length:94.2 ft. [28.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:19.7 ft. [6.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:20.3 ft. [6.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1913
Year reconstructed:1995
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Wood or timber [7]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:33 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:25.7 tons [23.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:70.2
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$39,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
November 201470.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair33
November 201254.2Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairPoor33
November 201154.2Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairPoor33
June 200955.8Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairPoor33
November 200673.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair33
May 200747.7Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorPoor104
November 200547.7Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor104
November 200462.8Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactoryPoor25
September 200346.8Not deficientGoodSatisfactorySerious25
March 200379.8Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryFair25
April 200146.8Not deficientGoodSatisfactorySerious10
April 199990.8Not deficientGoodGoodSatisfactory10
May 199768.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodSatisfactory10
April 199562.5Structurally deficientPoorGoodSatisfactory10
May 199364.5Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory10
October 199165.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory10