Share:

EASTLAKE AVE NE over NE 40TH ST, BURKE GILMAN

Map 

Coordinates:
+47.65455, -122.31894
47°39'16" N, 122°19'08" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:EASTLAKE AVE NE over NE 40TH ST, BURKE GILMAN
Structure number:085277000000000
Location:3800 Eastlake Ave
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:132.9 ft. [40.5 m]
Total length:975.1 ft. [297.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:58.1 ft. [17.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:75.1 ft. [22.9 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:18.0 ft. [5.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.1 ft. [4.0 m]
Skew angle:29°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1930
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:7
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Truss - Deck [09]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:32,300 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:60.4 tons [54.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.6 tons [33.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:87.2
Estimated cost of work:$3,829,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201587.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory32300
July 201386.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory39416
July 201286.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory39416
November 201186.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory39416
September 201089.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory39416
April 200889.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory35700
September 200689.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory35700
August 200589.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood35700
May 200390.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood30500
May 199990.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood30500
April 199890.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood30500
April 199690.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood31000
June 199566.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood31000
February 199366.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood31000
September 199188.8Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood31000