EASTLAKE AVE NE over PORTAGE BAY
Map
Coordinates:
+47.65226, -122.3207147°39'08" N, 122°19'15" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | EASTLAKE AVE NE over PORTAGE BAY |
| Structure number: | 085278000000000 |
| Location: | 3200 EASTLAKE AVE |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
| Length of largest span: | 217.9 ft. [66.4 m] |
| Total length: | 291.0 ft. [88.7 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 39.7 ft. [12.1 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 75.8 ft. [23.1 m] |
| Vertical clearance above deck: | 16.4 ft. [5.0 m] |
| Vertical clearance below bridge: | 44.0 ft. [13.4 m] |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1915 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1] |
| Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Movable - Bascule [16] |
| Deck type: | Open Grating [3] |
| Wearing surface: | Other [9] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, posting recommended but not legally implemented [B] |
| Average daily traffic: | 39,416 [as of 2010] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | In place and functioning [2] |
| Scour condition: | Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7] |
| Operating rating: | 48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 28.7 tons [26.1 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 63.1 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $51,000,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, posting recommended but not legally implemented [B] |
| Average daily traffic: | 30,500 [as of 1996] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | In place and functioning [2] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 28.7 tons [26.1 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 64.9 |
| Estimated cost of work: | $11,680,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 31,000 [as of 1988] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | In place and functioning [2] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 33.7 tons [30.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 24.8 tons [22.5 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 57.7 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of relocation of road. [32] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $11,680,000 |