FAIRVIEW AVE N over LAKE UNION
Map
Coordinates:
+47.63222, -122.3264447°37'56" N, 122°19'35" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | FAIRVIEW AVE N over LAKE UNION |
| Structure number: | 085505000000000 |
| Location: | 1400 Fairview Ave N |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
| Length of largest span: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
| Total length: | 501.0 ft. [152.7 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 25.3 ft. [7.7 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 26.6 ft. [8.1 m] |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1948 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 33 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
| Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 9,606 [as of 2009] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 37.6 tons [34.2 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 22.8 tons [20.7 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 24.0 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $13,746,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 8,200 [as of 1988] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 37.6 tons [34.2 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 22.8 tons [20.7 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 67.0 |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,064,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 8,200 [as of 1988] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations (including piles) on dry land well above flood water elevations. [9] |
| Operating rating: | 27.7 tons [25.2 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 18.8 tons [17.1 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 59.5 |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,064,000 |