+43.03212, -87.95774
43°01'56" N, 87°57'28" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:LRD N 35TH ST over IH 94-E-W FREEWAY
Structure number:B40001500000000
Location:0.7M N JCT STH 59
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:56.4 ft. [17.2 m]
Total length:117.1 ft. [35.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:82.0 ft. [25.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:106.0 ft. [32.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.4 ft. [4.7 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1961
Year reconstructed:1995
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:17,900 [as of 2013]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:53.9 tons [49.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:32.1 tons [29.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:82.1
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$962,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201582.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair17900
June 201382.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair17900
July 201191.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory17900
July 200986.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory17900
July 200786.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory17900
July 200574.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory19300
July 200358.5Not deficientSatisfactoryPoorFair19300
September 200156.7Not deficientGoodPoorFair20400
July 200073.6Not deficientGoodFairFair20400
September 199973.6Not deficientGoodFairFair20400
March 199857.9Not deficientGoodFairPoor13250
August 199657.9Not deficientVery GoodFairPoor13250
January 199662.1Structurally deficientExcellentFairPoor13250
October 199464.4Structurally deficientSeriousFairPoor13250
January 199464.4Structurally deficientSeriousFairPoor13250
November 199248.7Structurally deficientCriticalSatisfactorySerious13250
December 199148.7Structurally deficientCriticalSatisfactorySerious13250