STH 57-27TH ST over IH 94-E-W FREEWAY


+43.03409, -87.94776
43°02'03" N, 87°56'52" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:STH 57-27TH ST over IH 94-E-W FREEWAY
Structure number:B40004300000000
Location:0.8M N JCT USH 41
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:83.7 ft. [25.5 m]
Total length:154.5 ft. [47.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:62.0 ft. [18.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:80.1 ft. [24.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.4 ft. [5.0 m]
Skew angle:35°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1960
Year reconstructed:1981
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Low slump Concrete [4]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:16,500 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:53.9 tons [49.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:88.4
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$1,236,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201588.4Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory16500
September 201388.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory17430
October 201186.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory17430
July 200991.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory17430
July 200791.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory17430
July 200591.4Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory17430
July 200391.4Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory17430
October 200190.9Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory21200
July 200090.9Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory21200
September 199988.1Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory26500
March 199888.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory26500
July 199688.1Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodSatisfactory26500
February 199692.0Not deficientGoodVery GoodSatisfactory26500
September 199492.0Not deficientSatisfactoryVery GoodSatisfactory26500
November 199392.7Not deficientSatisfactoryVery GoodSatisfactory22050
November 199292.7Not deficientSatisfactoryVery GoodSatisfactory22050
December 199192.7Not deficientSatisfactoryVery GoodVery Good22050