Share:

LRD N TEUTONIA AVE over LRD W SILVER SPRING DR

Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:LRD N TEUTONIA AVE over LRD W SILVER SPRING DR
Structure number:B40006800000000
Location:0.7M W JCT STH 57
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:63.0 ft. [19.2 m]
Total length:66.3 ft. [20.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:87.9 ft. [26.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:106.0 ft. [32.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1964
Year reconstructed:2008
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Main span material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main span design:Frame [07]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:17,923 [as of 2013]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:80.9 tons [73.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:48.1 tons [43.7 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:95.1
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$591,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201495.1Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood17923
September 201291.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood25000
September 201086.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood25000
April 200986.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory25000
August 200818.7Structurally deficient---25000
October 200653.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory27300
August 200453.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory27300
July 200253.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory27300
October 200050.5Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory27300
May 199869.4Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory15900
July 199488.2Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory15900
July 199287.2Not deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory15900
August 199087.2Not deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory15900