Share:

LRD W LAPHAM BLVD over IH 43 NB/IH 94 WB

Map 

Coordinates:
+43.01426, -87.91622
43°00'51" N, 87°54'58" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:LRD W LAPHAM BLVD over IH 43 NB/IH 94 WB
Structure number:B40017100000000
Location:0.1M E JCT STH 38
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:64.0 ft. [19.5 m]
Total length:226.7 ft. [69.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:66.9 ft. [20.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:81.0 ft. [24.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1968
Year reconstructed:2015
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:7,000 [as of 2013]
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:34.1 tons [31.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:19.6 tons [17.8 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:56.2
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$1,762,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
November 201556.2Not deficientVery GoodGoodGood7000
March 201342.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair8700
April 201181.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair8700
May 200992.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory8700
May 200792.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory8700
June 200592.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory15400
June 200392.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory15400
October 200191.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory15400
July 200091.5Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory15400
November 199992.6Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory3700
February 199892.6Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory3700
October 199692.6Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory3700
February 199696.7Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory3700
December 199496.7Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory3700
September 199396.7Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory3700
January 199396.7Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory3700
March 199169.6Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor3700