USH 45 NB over IH 43 SB


+42.95916, -88.04189
42°57'33" N, 88°02'31" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:USH 45 NB over IH 43 SB
Structure number:B40018900000000
Location:0.8M N JCT STH 100 TO N
Purpose:Carries highway overpass over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:42.7 ft. [13.0 m]
Total length:114.5 ft. [34.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:35.8 ft. [10.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:38.7 ft. [11.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:27°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1966
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Low slump Concrete [4]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:19,300 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:55.7 tons [50.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:32.1 tons [29.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:74.4
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$734,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201474.4Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair19300
July 201275.4Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair19300
July 201075.2Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair20400
July 200887.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory20200
July 200683.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory40900
July 200483.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory40900
July 200283.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory40900
June 200087.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory19420
August 199983.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory26470
June 199883.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory26470
September 199683.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory26470
February 199687.9Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood26470
December 199487.9Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood26470
October 199390.8Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery Good14000
June 199260.1Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor14000
October 199160.1Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor14000