CTH PP - EB GOOD H over USH 41-USH 45-STH 100


+43.14690, -88.05470
43°08'49" N, 88°03'17" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:CTH PP - EB GOOD H over USH 41-USH 45-STH 100
Structure number:B40024800000000
Location:0.4 MI W JCT STH 145
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:60.4 ft. [18.4 m]
Total length:228.4 ft. [69.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:48.2 ft. [14.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:69.9 ft. [21.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.7 ft. [5.1 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1964
Year reconstructed:1997
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:23,200 [as of 2014]
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:53.9 tons [49.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:32.1 tons [29.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:80.8
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$1,775,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201480.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodFairSatisfactory23200
April 201294.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory7160
April 201092.6Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory7160
April 200892.1Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory18600
May 200692.8Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory4250
June 200492.8Not deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory4250
July 200292.8Not deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory4250
June 200094.6Not deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory4250
June 199994.8Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood2000
August 199648.5Structurally deficientPoorPoorGood2000
February 199663.8Structurally deficientPoorFairGood2000
April 199463.8Structurally deficientPoorFairGood2000
April 199347.6Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory2000
July 199247.6Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory2000
July 199133.3Structurally deficientPoorSeriousSatisfactory2000