Share:

CTH PP EB W GOOD over STH 145

Map 

Coordinates:
+43.14742, -88.05050
43°08'51" N, 88°03'02" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CTH PP EB W GOOD over STH 145
Structure number:B40025000000000
Location:2.3 MI W JCT STH 181
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:77.1 ft. [23.5 m]
Total length:226.4 ft. [69.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:49.5 ft. [15.1 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:69°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1964
Year reconstructed:1984
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:23,200 [as of 2014]
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:46.8 tons [42.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:55.4
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$1,760,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201455.4Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair23200
April 201262.8Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair15200
April 201062.4Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory21300
May 200862.6Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory18600
May 200673.3Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory26250
June 200473.3Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory26250
July 200373.3Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory26250
July 200262.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair26250
June 200078.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodFair26250
July 199980.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodFair8700
April 199880.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodFair8700
September 199691.1Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood8700
February 199693.3Structurally deficientPoorVery GoodGood8700
April 199493.3Structurally deficientPoorVery GoodGood8700
April 199393.3Structurally deficientPoorVery GoodSatisfactory8700
July 199293.3Structurally deficientPoorVery GoodSatisfactory8700
July 199166.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory8700