CTH PP WB - W GOOD over STH 145


+43.14754, -88.05066
43°08'51" N, 88°03'02" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:CTH PP WB - W GOOD over STH 145
Structure number:B40025100000000
Location:2.3M W JCT STH 181
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:77.1 ft. [23.5 m]
Total length:225.1 ft. [68.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:45.6 ft. [13.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Skew angle:20°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1964
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:23,200 [as of 2014]
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:28.5 tons [25.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:55.5
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$1,749,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201455.5Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair23200
April 201257.1Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair16100
April 201058.8Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory20300
May 200859.1Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory16800
May 200669.7Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory26250
June 200469.7Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory26250
July 200369.7Not deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory26250
July 200258.3Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair26250
June 200056.2Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair26250
July 199959.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodFair8700
April 199859.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodFair8700
September 199670.3Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory8700
March 199548.3Structurally deficientFairVery GoodPoor8700
April 199448.3Structurally deficientFairVery GoodPoor8700
April 199346.2Structurally deficientPoorVery GoodPoor8700
July 199246.2Structurally deficientPoorVery GoodPoor8700
March 199146.2Structurally deficientPoorVery GoodPoor8700