Share:

STH 181 NB-N 76TH over STH 145-W FOND DU LAC AV

Map 

Coordinates:
+43.11499, -88.00591
43°06'54" N, 88°00'21" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:STH 181 NB-N 76TH over STH 145-W FOND DU LAC AV
Structure number:B40025600000000
Location:1.4M N JCT USH 41
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:84.6 ft. [25.8 m]
Total length:291.4 ft. [88.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:45.6 ft. [13.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.4 ft. [5.0 m]
Skew angle:36°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1964
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Low slump Concrete [4]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:13,250 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:57.5 tons [52.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:33.9 tons [30.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:61.2
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$2,232,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201461.2Structurally deficientPoorFairFair13250
July 201261.5Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair10350
July 201075.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory14810
July 200875.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory14810
June 200675.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory14810
July 200475.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory14810
July 200275.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory14810
June 200073.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory17700
July 199970.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory37100
June 199870.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory37100
October 199670.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood37100
March 199573.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good37100
April 199473.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good37100
July 199375.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16900
November 199275.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactory16900
March 199128.3Structurally deficientPoorVery GoodSerious16900