Share:

LRD W GRANTOSA DR over STH 145-W FOND DU LAC AV

Map 

Coordinates:
+43.11227, -88.00248
43°06'44" N, 88°00'09" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:LRD W GRANTOSA DR over STH 145-W FOND DU LAC AV
Structure number:B40028000000000
Location:0.2M E JCT STH 181
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:69.9 ft. [21.3 m]
Total length:198.2 ft. [60.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:45.6 ft. [13.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1965
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Other [9]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,750 [as of 2012]
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:43.1 tons [39.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:25.0 tons [22.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:52.9
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$1,381,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201452.9Structurally deficientPoorFairFair2750
July 201257.9Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryFair2750
July 201088.4Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory4500
July 200888.4Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory4500
June 200688.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory3950
July 200488.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory3950
July 200288.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory3950
June 200079.4Not deficientFairFairSatisfactory3950
July 199989.1Not deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory6675
June 199889.1Not deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory6675
October 199690.1Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory6675
March 199591.7Not deficientGoodGoodGood6675
April 199491.7Not deficientGoodGoodGood6675
July 199391.7Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood6675
November 199291.7Not deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory6675
February 199162.6Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryPoor6675