Share:

LRD W GRANTOSA DR over STH 145-W FOND DU LAC AV

Map 

Coordinates:
+43.11218, -88.00262
43°06'44" N, 88°00'09" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:LRD W GRANTOSA DR over STH 145-W FOND DU LAC AV
Structure number:B40028100000000
Location:0.2M E JCT STH 181
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:69.9 ft. [21.3 m]
Total length:198.2 ft. [60.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:45.6 ft. [13.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1965
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Other [9]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,750 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:43.1 tons [39.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:25.0 tons [22.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:64.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$1,381,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201464.0Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory2750
July 201269.0Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory2750
July 201089.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory4500
July 200889.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory4500
June 200674.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory124000
July 200474.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory124000
July 200274.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory124000
October 200190.6Not deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory3450
June 200090.6Not deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory3450
July 199989.1Not deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory6675
June 199889.1Not deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory6675
October 199690.1Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory6675
March 199591.7Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good6675
April 199491.7Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good6675
July 199391.7Not deficientGoodGoodGood6675
November 199291.7Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood6675
February 199162.6Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryPoor6675