Share:

LRD RAMP MINERAL S over STH 59

Map 

Coordinates:
+43.02325, -87.92132
43°01'24" N, 87°55'17" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:LRD RAMP MINERAL S over STH 59
Structure number:B400285023B0000
Location:1.5 MI N JCT STH 38
Purpose:Carries highway overpass over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:88.6 ft. [27.0 m]
Total length:259.9 ft. [79.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:20.7 ft. [6.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:23.6 ft. [7.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:22.3 ft. [6.8 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1968
Year reconstructed:1987
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Low slump Concrete [4]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,600 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:53.9 tons [49.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:37.4 tons [34.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:77.8
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$1,559,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201477.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood3600
July 201275.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory3400
July 201075.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory3400
July 200875.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory3400
June 200775.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory3400
June 200575.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory3100
June 200375.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory3100
July 200267.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory132700
October 200075.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory2600
October 199975.5Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory3982
August 199875.5Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory3982
November 199676.5Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory3982
February 199677.6Not deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory3982
February 199577.6Not deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory3982
February 199477.6Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood3982
September 199277.6Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory3982
January 199277.6Not deficientSatisfactoryVery GoodVery Good3982