STH 100 NB-N LOVER over LITTLE MENOMONEE RIVER
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | STH 100 NB-N LOVER over LITTLE MENOMONEE RIVER |
| Structure number: | B40034400000000 |
| Location: | 1.2M N JCT STH 190 (G) |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
| Length of largest span: | 50.2 ft. [15.3 m] |
| Total length: | 125.3 ft. [38.2 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 36.1 ft. [11.0 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 45.6 ft. [13.9 m] |
| Skew angle: | 3° |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1968 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
| Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Low slump Concrete [4] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 5,800 [as of 2007] |
| Truck traffic: | 3% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 44.6 tons [40.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 86.5 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,022,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 13,730 [as of 1992] |
| Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 44.6 tons [40.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 89.5 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 5,360 [as of 1979] |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 44.6 tons [40.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 61.5 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |