Share:

CTH EE - W HAMPTON over USH 45-ZOO FREEWAY

Map 

Coordinates:
+43.10484, -88.05789
43°06'17" N, 88°03'28" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CTH EE - W HAMPTON over USH 45-ZOO FREEWAY
Structure number:B40036000000000
Location:0.2M W OF JCT STH 100
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:82.0 ft. [25.0 m]
Total length:365.8 ft. [111.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:98.1 ft. [29.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:116.1 ft. [35.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1967
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Low slump Concrete [4]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:18,300 [as of 2013]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:44.9 tons [40.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:86.5
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$2,776,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201586.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory18300
September 201386.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood18300
November 201186.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood16200
November 200986.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood16200
July 200875.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair16200
July 200686.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory20300
July 200486.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory20300
July 200286.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory20300
June 200087.5Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory20300
August 199988.0Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory15210
April 199888.0Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory15210
August 199688.0Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory15210
March 199590.6Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory15210
April 199490.6Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory15210
April 199390.6Not deficientSatisfactoryVery GoodSatisfactory15210
July 199290.6Not deficientSatisfactoryVery GoodSatisfactory15210
March 199190.6Not deficientSatisfactoryVery GoodSatisfactory15210