+43.12646, -88.05687
43°07'35" N, 88°03'25" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:LRD W FLORIST AVE over USH 45-STH 100
Structure number:B40036900000000
Location:AT JCT WITH USH 41
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:84.6 ft. [25.8 m]
Total length:173.2 ft. [52.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:54.1 ft. [16.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1967
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,200 [as of 2012]
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:52.1 tons [47.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:30.3 tons [27.5 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:75.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$1,066,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201475.0Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair2200
April 201275.6Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair2200
April 201061.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair2200
May 200873.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2200
August 200662.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair3100
July 200462.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair3100
July 200262.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair3100
June 200062.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair3100
July 199962.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair1000
April 199862.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair1000
August 199673.8Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory1000
March 199577.8Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory1000
April 199450.7Structurally deficientGoodPoorFair1000
April 199366.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair1000
July 199250.7Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor1000
March 199150.7Structurally deficientSatisfactoryVery GoodPoor1000