Share:

IH RAMP, IH 794 EB over LAND

Map 

Coordinates:
+43.00500, -87.89167
43°00'18" N, 87°53'30" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:IH RAMP, IH 794 EB over LAND
Structure number:B4004000S220000
Location:3.3 MI E JCT IH 94
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:129.9 ft. [39.6 m]
Total length:390.1 ft. [118.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1977
Year reconstructed:2014
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:5,120 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:86.2 tons [78.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:51.7 tons [47.0 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:93.8
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$2,296,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
November 201493.8Not deficientExcellentGoodGood5120
June 201392.8Not deficientFairSatisfactoryGood4680
June 201178.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory40100
June 200988.7Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory4500
June 200788.7Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory4500
June 200589.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory3500
June 200389.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory3500
October 200287.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood11150
October 200187.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood13250
October 200087.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood13250
August 199988.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16280
October 199888.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16280
August 199688.2Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood16280
February 199687.9Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood16280
December 199487.9Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood16280
February 199490.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood8570
December 199290.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodSatisfactory8570
January 199287.2Structurally deficientPoorVery GoodSatisfactory8570