CTH PP W GOOD HOP over LITTLE MENOMONEE RIVER
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | CTH PP W GOOD HOP over LITTLE MENOMONEE RIVER |
| Structure number: | B40049700000000 |
| Location: | 1.1M W JCT STH 181 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
| Length of largest span: | 106.0 ft. [32.3 m] |
| Total length: | 107.9 ft. [32.9 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 55.1 ft. [16.8 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1974 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
| Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 16,650 [as of 2007] |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Inventory rating: | 42.8 tons [38.9 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 73.9 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $895,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 9,750 [as of 1979] |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Inventory rating: | 42.8 tons [38.9 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 78.3 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 9,750 [as of 1979] |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Inventory rating: | 42.6 tons [38.7 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 78.2 |