Share:

CTH PP W GOOD HOP over LITTLE MENOMONEE RIVER

Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CTH PP W GOOD HOP over LITTLE MENOMONEE RIVER
Structure number:B40049800000000
Location:0.9M E JCT STH 100
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:106.0 ft. [32.3 m]
Total length:107.9 ft. [32.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:66.6 ft. [20.3 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1974
Year reconstructed:2010
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:16,650 [as of 2012]
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:88.4 tons [80.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:32.8 tons [29.8 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:95.2

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201495.2Not deficientVery GoodGoodGood16650
August 201293.2Not deficientVery GoodGoodGood16650
August 201032.9Not deficientExcellentGoodGood16650
July 200871.8Structurally deficientPoorGoodSatisfactory16650
August 200671.8Structurally deficientPoorGoodSatisfactory16650
May 200571.8Structurally deficientPoorGoodSatisfactory16650
August 200473.9Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory16650
July 200273.9Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood16650
November 200073.9Functionally obsoleteFairVery GoodGood16650
January 199976.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodGood9750
December 199676.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodGood9750
October 199478.2Not deficientSatisfactoryVery GoodGood9750
November 199278.2Not deficientSatisfactoryVery GoodSatisfactory9750
October 199078.2Not deficientSatisfactoryVery GoodSatisfactory9750