LRD S 43RD ST over KINNICKINNICK RIVER
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | LRD S 43RD ST over KINNICKINNICK RIVER |
| Structure number: | B40056100000000 |
| Location: | 0.4M N JCT STH 24 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
| Length of largest span: | 23.6 ft. [7.2 m] |
| Total length: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 47.9 ft. [14.6 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 64.0 ft. [19.5 m] |
| Skew angle: | 8° |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1987 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main span design: | Slab [01] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 23,700 [as of 2007] |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
| Operating rating: | 55.2 tons [50.2 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 37.4 tons [34.0 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 61.1 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $290,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 12,000 [as of 1987] |
| Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 55.2 tons [50.2 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 37.4 tons [34.0 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 75.4 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 12,000 [as of 1987] |
| Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Culvert condition: | No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 55.4 tons [50.4 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 37.6 tons [34.2 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 75.5 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |