Share:

STH 38-CHASE AVE over CNW RR

Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:STH 38-CHASE AVE over CNW RR
Structure number:B40057100000000
Location:3.7M N JCT CTH ZZ
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:46.6 ft. [14.2 m]
Total length:141.1 ft. [43.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:64.0 ft. [19.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:89.9 ft. [27.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Skew angle:32°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1939
Year reconstructed:1982
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:18,874 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Serious [3 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:68.3 tons [62.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:41.0 tons [37.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:44.7
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$1,138,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201544.7Structurally deficientPoorPoorSerious18874
September 201444.9Structurally deficientPoorPoorSerious18504
September 201344.9Structurally deficientPoorPoorSerious18504
September 201244.9Structurally deficientPoorPoorSerious18504
September 201043.2Structurally deficientPoorPoorSerious23470
August 200880.1Not deficientFairFairFair23470
August 200680.1Not deficientFairFairFair23470
August 200480.1Not deficientFairFairFair23470
September 200280.1Not deficientFairFairFair23470
November 200079.7Not deficientFairFairFair25700
November 199893.8Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory15600
August 199691.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory15600
August 199495.7Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory15600
December 199295.0Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory19870
October 199095.0Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory19870