Share:

CTH EE - W HAMPTON over MENOMONEE RIVER

Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CTH EE - W HAMPTON over MENOMONEE RIVER
Structure number:B40069800000000
Location:0.1M E USH 45
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:91.9 ft. [28.0 m]
Total length:197.8 ft. [60.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:40.7 ft. [12.4 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:2004
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:20,100 [as of 2012]
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:79.0 tons [71.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:39.2 tons [35.6 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:95.1

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201495.1Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good20100
August 201293.1Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good20100
September 201095.1Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good20100
July 200895.1Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good20100
August 200677.4Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good20100
December 200478.6Not applicableExcellentExcellentExcellent20100