+43.62218, -90.62923
43°37'20" N, 90°37'45" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:B62001100000000
Location:1.2M W JCT STH 131
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:100.1 ft. [30.5 m]
Total length:104.7 ft. [31.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:26.6 ft. [8.1 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1955
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Truss - Thru [10]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2014 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:100 [as of 2012]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:37.7 tons [34.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:25.0 tons [22.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:66.9
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$420,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
October 201466.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairGood100
October 201258.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairGood100
October 201069.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery Good100
October 200869.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery Good100
October 200669.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodVery Good100
October 200469.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodVery Good100
October 200269.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodVery Good100
October 200072.6Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodVery Good100
June 199868.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodVery Good100
October 199667.1Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodVery Good110
May 199466.0Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery Good110
November 199271.1Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood70
November 199071.1Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood70