Share:

LRD S HOWELL AVE over UP RR

Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:LRD S HOWELL AVE over UP RR
Structure number:P40050900000000
Location:0.4M N JCT STH 38
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:45.9 ft. [14.0 m]
Total length:123.0 ft. [37.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:55.1 ft. [16.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:71.9 ft. [21.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:18.4 ft. [5.6 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1958
Year reconstructed:2010
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:5,801 [as of 2011]
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:50.6 tons [46.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:41.7 tons [37.9 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:95.7
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$1,006,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201495.7Not deficientVery GoodGoodGood5801
September 201293.7Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood5801
November 201055.4Not deficientExcellentSatisfactoryGood7100
July 200975.8Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory6600
August 200875.8Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory6600
August 200675.8Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory6600
August 200475.8Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory6600
September 200275.4Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory8500
December 200075.4Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory8500
March 199886.7Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory8500
September 199686.7Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory8500
August 199490.6Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory8500
October 199290.6Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory8500
September 199090.6Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory8500